Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Script

Script for analysis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3041v1/supp-2

Read me

Supporting information for the interpretation and use of the raw data and analysis script.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3041v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Guillaume Dezecache performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Claudia Wilke conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nathalie Richi performed the experiments.

Christof Neumann analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Klaus Zuberbühler conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Permission to conduct the study was granted by the Ugandan Wildlife Authority (UWA) and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST). Ethics approval was given by the University of St Andrews’ ethics committee.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Permission to conduct the study was granted by the Ugandan Wildlife Authority (UWA) and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST). Ethics approval was given by the University of St Andrews’ ethics committee.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Uploaded as a supplementary file, along with the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by a Fyssen fellowship awarded to GD, and has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement (No 283871). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies