Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Supplemental Information

Suppl. material 1: Figure S1

Developed fusion primers for fwh1 and fwh2 on the Illumina high throughput sequencing platform.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-1

Suppl. material 2: Figure S2

Overview of similarity of used inline tags for the fwh1 and fwh2 fusion primers.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-2

Suppl. material 3: Table S1

Overview of the three Romanian macrozoobenthos sampling sites (Z2, L2, R2).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-3

Suppl. material 4: Figure S3

Overview of the macroinvertebrates composition of the three sample sites in Romania.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-4

Suppl. material 5: Table S2

Overview of used tagging combinations for sample multiplexing for sequencing.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-5

Suppl. material 6: Figure S4

Gradient PCR optimisation for the fwh primer sets.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-6

Suppl. material 7: Script S1

JAMP metabarcoding pipeline (used R commands).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-7

Suppl. material 8: Figure S5

Number of raw sequences obtained for each sample after demultiplexing.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-8

Suppl. material 9: Table S3

OTU table for the 52 taxa mock samples sequenced with the fwh1 and fwh2 primer set.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-9

Suppl. material 10: Figure S6

Proportion of shared reads between the two replicates for DceM amplified with the fwh1 primer set.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-10

Suppl. material 11: Figure S7

Sample composition of Romanian macroinvertebrate samples.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3037v1/supp-11

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Ecaterina Edith Vamos conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Vasco Elbrecht conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Florian Leese conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

Raw sequencing data is available on NCBI SRA (SRR5295658 and SRR5295659).

Funding

EV was supported by a fellowship of the Dr. Musat V. Bodnarescu foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies