Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Summary and dispersion statistics

Minimum, maximum, and mean values of number of shot hole borers captured per trap for each experiment. Standard error of the mean and Pearson’s dispersion statistic is also reported.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3032v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Christine Dodge performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jessica Coolidge performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Miriam Cooperband conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Allard Cossé conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Daniel Carrillo conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Richard Stouthamer conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

1) Figshare

2) DOI/links for data:

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5021327.v1

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5021297.v1

3) https://figshare.com/projects/Dodge_et_al_2017_-_QUERCIVOROL_MS/22013

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants to RS from the California Avocado Commission, USDA NIFA Hatch Fund 194617, and USDA Farm Bill 14-8130-0238-CA. This research was funded through Section 10007 of the Farm Bill. Mention of a commercial product does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for its use by the United States Department of Agriculture. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies