Visitors   Views   Downloads

Comparative transcriptomics and ribo-seq: Looking at de novo gene emergence in Saccharomycotina

View preprint
Comparative transcriptomics and ribo-seq: Looking at de novo gene emergence in Saccharomycotina [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/bYmkUmZRim …
PeerJ: Comparative transcriptomics and ribo-seq: Looking at de novo gene emergence in Saccharomycotina https://t.co/BWFLDkGjZw
Comparative transcriptomics and ribo-seq: Looking at de novo gene emergence in Saccharomycotina https://t.co/RJoFDHyBzH In de nov…
155 days ago
Comparative transcriptomics and ribo-seq: Looking at de novo gene emergence in Saccharomycotina https://t.co/2g0c4yMoaY
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.
Highlighted in The SMBE 2017 Collection

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

William Blevins conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mar Albà conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lucas Carey conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data will be uploaded upon acceptance of the future article for publication; this submission is just the abstract.

Funding

The work was funded by grants BFU2012-36820 and BFU2015-65235-P from Ministerio de Economía e Innovación (Spanish Government) and co-funded by FEDER (EC). We also received funding from Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR), grant number 2014SGR1121. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies