Visitors   Views   Downloads

Human agency beliefs influence behaviour during virtual social interactions

View preprint
185 days ago
RT @DrBrocktagon: Do we interact differently with an avatar if we think it is controlled by real person? New #preprint w @NateCaruana https…
RT @DrBrocktagon: Do we interact differently with an avatar if we think it is controlled by real person? New #preprint w @NateCaruana https…
185 days ago
RT @DrBrocktagon: Do we interact differently with an avatar if we think it is controlled by real person? New #preprint w @NateCaruana https…
RT @DrBrocktagon: Do we interact differently with an avatar if we think it is controlled by real person? New #preprint w @NateCaruana https…
RT @autismcrisis: If you tell typical adults an algorithm is human, most (92%) believe this https://t.co/bKs8qMFPGR @DrBrocktagon preprint,…
If you tell typical adults an algorithm is human, most (92%) believe this https://t.co/bKs8qMFPGR @DrBrocktagon preprint, autism-relevant
RT @DrBrocktagon: Do we interact differently with an avatar if we think it is controlled by real person? New #preprint w @NateCaruana https…
186 days ago
RT @uranus_2: バーチャル世界での共同注意ゲームでパートナーがアルゴリズムで制御されていると言われた場合と比較して、人間が制御していると言われるとアイコンタクトが遅くなり、見つめ合う前に相手を誘導しようとするHuman agency beliefs…https://…
バーチャル世界での共同注意ゲームでパートナーがアルゴリズムで制御されていると言われた場合と比較して、人間が制御していると言われるとアイコンタクトが遅くなり、見つめ合う前に相手を誘導しようとするHuman agency beliefs…https://t.co/FtA2QRcI61
Do we interact differently with an avatar if we think it is controlled by real person? New #preprint w @NateCaruana https://t.co/kubua1vvhN https://t.co/I4P4FmjNlG
186 days ago
Human agency beliefs influence behaviour during virtual social interactions https://t.co/yiNuEtbhZR
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

R Markdown of data analysis pipeline and results

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3018v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Dr Jon Brock is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Nathan Caruana conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Dean Spirou conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jon Brock conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study was approved by the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval reference: 5201200021).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

(1) Raw data and R code can be downloaded from the Open Science Framework.

(2) osf.io/yqb7g

(3) https://osf.io/yqb7g/?view_only=3a14468af22b4465920962ee289ea742. R

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Cognition and its Disorders [CE110001021] www.ccd.edu.au. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies