Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Holiday 6D integrated linkage map

Mapping data for Axiom markers was obtained from Bassil et al. (2015).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2975v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Kelly J Vining analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Natalia Salinas conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jacob A Tennessen analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jason D Zurn analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Daniel James Sargent reviewed drafts of the paper.

James Hancock reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nahla V Bassil conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The data is available via the NCBI Sequence Read Archive, BioProject PRJNA385347 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA385347

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The POLiMAPS pipeline was previously published, and is cited in the manuscript. The research in this article did not make use of any previously unpublished code.

Funding

This work was partially funded by USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture—Specialty Crop Research Initiative projects, ‘RosBREED: Enabling Marker-Assisted Breeding in Rosaceae’ (2009-51181-05808). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies