Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplementary figures and tables

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2958v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Fabian Roger conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christian Alsterberg conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lea Wittorf conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kristina Sundbäck contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Stefan Hulth contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sara Hallin conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lars Gamfeldt conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The data will be made publicly available with the peer-reviewed version of this preprint

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The code for the analysis will be made available on GitHub (https://github.com/FabianRoger)

Funding

The work has been financed by the Swedish Research Council (VR) grant 621-2009-5457 to L. Gamfeldt, by the Swedish Research Council Formas (grant 2012-695) to Kristina Sundba ̈ck, the Swedish Research Council (VR) grant 2011-4421 to S. Hallin. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies