Visitors   Views   Downloads

Defending scientific integrity in conservation policy processes: lessons from Canada, Australia, and the United States

View preprint
RT @SCBNorthAmerica: What next after #sciencemarch? New paper suggests 8 actions needed to defend scientific integrity @Society4Conbio http…
217 days ago
RT @environmentinst: Scientific integrity is under threat, especially in conservation. Lessons learnt from Canada, Australia and USA https:…
Scientific integrity is under threat, especially in conservation. Lessons learnt from Canada, Australia and USA https://t.co/MCsEDvPGdE
RT @martine_maron: Science integrity in conservation policy https://t.co/Qdc4lsVURs via @PeerJPreprints w @cyclonewatson @EuanRitchie1
229 days ago
RT @SCBNorthAmerica: New paper by authors @ #sciencemarch orgs asks what next 2 defend science? @society4conbio @csee_scee @e4dca @ucsusa h…
RT @GretchenTG: My new paper (preprint): Eight actions needed to defend scientific integrity https://t.co/blJcnx8fqq Perfect post #marchfor…
229 days ago
RT @SCBNorthAmerica: New paper by authors @ #sciencemarch orgs asks what next 2 defend science? @society4conbio @csee_scee @e4dca @ucsusa h…
RT @SCBNorthAmerica: New paper by authors @ #sciencemarch orgs asks what next 2 defend science? @society4conbio @csee_scee @e4dca @ucsusa h…
RT @SCBNorthAmerica: New paper by authors @ #sciencemarch orgs asks what next 2 defend science? @society4conbio @csee_scee @e4dca @ucsusa h…
New paper by authors @ #sciencemarch orgs asks what next 2 defend science? @society4conbio @csee_scee @e4dca @ucsusa https://t.co/DOgFr8veK1
RT @martine_maron: Science integrity in conservation policy https://t.co/Qdc4lsVURs via @PeerJPreprints w @cyclonewatson @EuanRitchie1
RT @martine_maron: Science integrity in conservation policy https://t.co/Qdc4lsVURs via @PeerJPreprints w @cyclonewatson @EuanRitchie1
RT @martine_maron: Science integrity in conservation policy https://t.co/Qdc4lsVURs via @PeerJPreprints w @cyclonewatson @EuanRitchie1
RT @JeTKerr: My preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/uibkoSaMEE #ConservationBiology #SciencePolicy
RT @martine_maron: Science integrity in conservation policy https://t.co/Qdc4lsVURs via @PeerJPreprints w @cyclonewatson @EuanRitchie1
RT @GretchenTG: My new paper (preprint): Eight actions needed to defend scientific integrity https://t.co/blJcnx8fqq Perfect post #marchfor…
RT @GretchenTG: My new paper (preprint): Eight actions needed to defend scientific integrity https://t.co/blJcnx8fqq Perfect post #marchfor…
RT @GretchenTG: My new paper (preprint): Eight actions needed to defend scientific integrity https://t.co/blJcnx8fqq Perfect post #marchfor…
on scientific integrity:'ensure greater diversity of expert input with transparency regarding conflicts of interest' https://t.co/6Z2hk3j0fh
RT @martine_maron: Science integrity in conservation policy https://t.co/Qdc4lsVURs via @PeerJPreprints w @cyclonewatson @EuanRitchie1
RT @martine_maron: Science integrity in conservation policy https://t.co/Qdc4lsVURs via @PeerJPreprints w @cyclonewatson @EuanRitchie1
RT @EuanRitchie1: Our preprint @PeerJPreprints 'Defending scientific integrity in conservation policy processes https://t.co/YQK1Sm0dDa @Ca…
RT @martine_maron: Science integrity in conservation policy https://t.co/Qdc4lsVURs via @PeerJPreprints w @cyclonewatson @EuanRitchie1
Our preprint @PeerJPreprints 'Defending scientific integrity in conservation policy processes https://t.co/YQK1Sm0dDa @Carlos_Carroll et al.
Opinion piece: "Defending scientific integrity in conservation policy processes" #sciencepolicy https://t.co/Mss4vh5Rec @EKLIPSE_project
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Carlos Carroll conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Brett Hartl conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gretchen T Goldman conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Daniel J Rohlf conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Adrain Treves conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jeremy T Kerr performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Euan G Ritchie performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Richard T Kingsford performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Katherine E Gibbs performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Martine Maron performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

James E M Watson performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any code, or any data beyond what is presented in the manuscript itself, due to the nature of the analysis.

Funding

The work of the first author was supported by the Wilburforce Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies