Use of necrophagous insects as evidence of cadaver relocation: myth or reality?

CHU Lille, EA 7367 - UTML - Unite de Taphonomie Medico-Legale, Univ Lille, 59000 Lille, France
Research Institute of Biosciences, Laboratory of Zoology, UMONS - Université de Mons, Mons, Belgium
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.2934v1
Subject Areas
Animal Behavior, Ecology, Entomology, Public Health
Keywords
blowflies, larvae, forensic entomology, necrophagous, biotope, taphonomy, forensic pathology, crime scene investigation
Copyright
© 2017 Charabidze et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Charabidze D, Gosselin M, Hedouin V. 2017. Use of necrophagous insects as evidence of cadaver relocation: myth or reality? PeerJ Preprints 5:e2934v1

Abstract

The use of insects as indicators of postmortem displacement is discussed in many text, courses and TV shows, and several studies addressing this issue have been published. However, the concept is widely cited but poorly understood, and only a few forensic cases have successfully applied such a method. Surprisingly, this question has never be taken into account entirely as a cross-disciplinary theme. The use of necrophagous insects as evidence of cadaver relocation actually involves a wide range of data on their biology: distribution areas, microhabitats, phenology, behavioral ecology and molecular analysis are among the research areas linked to this problem. This article reviews for the first time the current knowledge on these questions and analysze the possibilities/limitations of each method to evaluate their feasibility. This analysis reveals numerous weaknesses and mistaken beliefs but also many concrete possibilities and research opportunities.

Author Comment

This is a submission to PeerJ for review.