Visitors   Views   Downloads

The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research

View preprint
136 days ago
RT @pash22: The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/pInBBvrELh via @thePee…
136 days ago
The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/pInBBvrELh via @thePeerJ
The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/jU14pKAbsj via @PeerJPreprints
The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/LdMpcqAErY
The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/QiRRClx0T3
160 days ago
The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/BJBEJUkDUf
The earth is flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/tsfN5XxOZV vía @PeerJPreprints
“The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research” https://t.co/83Rbba0jDX
195 days ago
RT @keholsinger: The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/IY2xczQyv4
The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/IY2xczQyv4
RT @KeepCitiesWeird: “The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research” https://t.co/edLJV7IPbE
“The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research” https://t.co/edLJV7IPbE
199 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
The earth is flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/5gw0Rx4hYH via @PeerJPreprints
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
https://t.co/HqQOGlxMrO From the Bernouilli's home city another look at statistical significance, fixed thresholds & the replication crisis
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @mircealungu: Small p-values do not guarantee replication. Only way to know how replicable a result is: actual replication !! https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
204 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
204 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @FBpsy: Interpretando los p-valores como dimensiones continuas: A la porra el p < 0.05! https://t.co/QH4WZsnffQ vía @PeerJPreprints
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
204 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @mircealungu: Small p-values do not guarantee replication. Only way to know how replicable a result is: actual replication !! https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
https://t.co/avKbC5zz0K
205 days ago
RT @mircealungu: Small p-values do not guarantee replication. Only way to know how replicable a result is: actual replication !! https://t…
RT @mircealungu: Small p-values do not guarantee replication. Only way to know how replicable a result is: actual replication !! https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @mircealungu: Small p-values do not guarantee replication. Only way to know how replicable a result is: actual replication !! https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
RT @mircealungu: Small p-values do not guarantee replication. Only way to know how replicable a result is: actual replication !! https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
Small p-values do not guarantee replication. Only way to know how replicable a result is: actual replication !! https://t.co/pFlfnXSFyq
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @FBpsy: Interpretando los p-valores como dimensiones continuas: A la porra el p < 0.05! https://t.co/QH4WZsnffQ vía @PeerJPreprints
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
Interpretando los p-valores como dimensiones continuas: A la porra el p < 0.05! https://t.co/QH4WZsnffQ vía @PeerJPreprints
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
205 days ago
RT @BrianNosek: New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t…
New PeerJ Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t.co/HEXua4KZQd https://t.co/T0iRf1l8Ve
The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/QiRRClx0T3
Interesting reading - Mathematical vs. scientific significance. The earth is flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/XjnZGUJ5cE via @PeerJPreprints
217 days ago
The Earth Is Flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/7JUIakhYGo
217 days ago
RT @joachimgoedhart: New @PeerJPreprints: The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https…
RT @joachimgoedhart: New @PeerJPreprints: The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https…
RT @joachimgoedhart: New @PeerJPreprints: The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https…
RT @joachimgoedhart: New @PeerJPreprints: The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https…
New @PeerJPreprints: The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/BW0zeM5l9k
New Preprint: "The earth is flat (p>0.05): Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research" https://t.co/gBBDMwhkVC
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Valentin Amrhein conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tobias Roth conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

This is a review without empirical data.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 156294), the Swiss Association Pro Petite Camargue Alsacienne, the Fondation de bienfaisance Jeanne Lovioz and the MAVA Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Feedback on other revisions


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies