Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Table 1

Organism name, NCBI taxonomic identifier and accession number of genomes and plasmid sequences, and sequence length used in the baseline assessment. The random seed used to generate the simulated reads is also provided.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2913v1/supp-1

Supplemental Table 2

Taxonomic and sequence accession information for representative genomes used for contaminant detection assessment.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2913v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Nathan D Olson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Justin M Zook conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jayne B Morrow conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nancy J Lin conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Github

Bioinformatics Pipeline

https://github.com/nate-d-olson/genomic_purity

Data analysis and manuscript

https://github.com/nate-d-olson/genomic_purity_analysis

Funding

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate supported this work under the Interagency Agreement HSHQPM-15-T-00019 with the NIST. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies