Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Rscript for chilling recovery and deaths

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-1

Rscript for TEA recovery of all treatments

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-3

Rscript for CO2 recovery and deaths

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-4

Rscript TEA 25% for recovery

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-5

Rscript TEA 75% for recovery

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-6

Rscript TEA 100% for recovery

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-7

Rscript for the Group 2 experiments for deaths

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-8

Rscript for the Group 2 recovery

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-9

Rscript TEA 50% for recovery

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-11

Chilling recovery and deaths data table

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-12

CO2 recovery and deaths table

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2874v1/supp-13

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Ryan Rayl has no competing interests. Stephen Wratten is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Ryan Rayl conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Stephen Wratten conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper, final approval for submission..

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

1 - Figshare

2 - 4141749

3 URL - https://figshare.com/articles/Final_anesthesia_awake_txt/4141749

Funding

This work was supported by a Callaghan Innovation Fellowship from the government of New Zealand and the Bio-Protection Research Centre in Lincoln, New Zealand. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies