Challenges in evaluation of pain and a pre-incisional line block

Mythos Veterinary LLC, Gainesville, Fl, USA
Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Department of Clinical Sciences & Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, CA, USA
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.282v2
Subject Areas
Veterinary Medicine
Keywords
lidocaine, bupivacaine, Dog, pain assessment, local anesthetic
Copyright
© 2014 McKune et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
McKune C, Pascoe P, Kass PH, Lascelles BDX. 2014. Challenges in evaluation of pain and a pre-incisional line block. PeerJ PrePrints 2:e282v2

Abstract

Background: Our objective was to test the effectiveness of a local anesthetic line block administered before surgery in reducing postoperative pain scores in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy (OVHX). This study was a prospective, randomized, blinded, clinical trial involving 59 healthy female dogs. An algometric pressure-measuring device was used to determine nociceptive threshold, and compared to three subjective pain scales. Group L/B received a line block of lidocaine (4 mg/kg) and bupivacaine (1 mg/kg) subcutaneously in the area of the proposed incision and saline subcutaneously as premedication; group L/BM (positive control) received a similar block and morphine (0.5 mg/kg) subcutaneously for premedication; and group SS (negative control) received a saline line block and saline premedication. Criteria for rescue analgesia were defined before the study. Dogs were assessed prior to surgery, at extubation (time 0) and at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-recovery. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, and a repeated measures ANOVA with one grouping factor and one repeat factor (time). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Pain was so subtle that there were no significant differences between treatment groups with any assessment method, and no significant difference between positive and negative controls. Conclusions: Pain in non-verbal responders is subtle, even in animals with a known painful stimulus. Pre-emptive, intraoperative and post-operative analgesia is necessary regardless of pain score within the first 24 hours. None of the pain scales evaluated were sensitive enough to determine pain in all animals in this study.

Author Comment

This is the most current version of the manuscript including the Table, Figure legends, and Figures.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.282v2/supp-1

Supplemental Information 2

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.282v2/supp-2

Supplemental Information 3

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.282v2/supp-3

Supplemental Information 4

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.282v2/supp-4

Supplemental Information 5

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.282v2/supp-5

Supplemental Information 6

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.282v2/supp-6