Visitors   Views   Downloads

Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc

View preprint
RT @DanielSHayes: 10 rules for a successful remote #postdoc https://t.co/6S7mvw9Q6b @PeerJPreprints #PhDchat #PostDocChat https://t.co/HbH…
Here's another one, this by @KRBurgio and collaborators. https://t.co/JYhG8CUTKl
RT @ethanwhite: @skmorgane @brandonscooper @JJ_Emerson @katyhuff @ryneches @Hao_and_Y @RallidaeRule @TrashBirdEcol @mlrethlefsen @LeafyEric…
@skmorgane @brandonscooper @JJ_Emerson @katyhuff @ryneches @Hao_and_Y @RallidaeRule @TrashBirdEcol @mlrethlefsen @LeafyEricScott @KatheMathBio @itatiVCS @ashiklom711 The section on remote management and associated tools was heavily influenced by our "Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc" led by @KRBurgio & @CaitlinInMaine along w/@PetrelStation @skmorgane @JacquelynGill @kurtingeman @skmorgane @tefferfish https://t.co/997NqESMRw
159 days ago
Is this real ? I s that even possible ? 10 rules for a successful remote postdoc https://t.co/SsQ4cw1v6q via @PeerJPreprints
Here is the "Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc" paper by @KRBurgio et al. mentioned in @ethanwhite's intro. https://t.co/nb5UKeLiPQ
10 rules for a successful remote #postdoc https://t.co/6S7mvw9Q6b @PeerJPreprints #PhDchat #PostDocChat https://t.co/HbHo7nwMjP
@cjlortie @ecoblender this is a useful #Preprint https://t.co/u8X5A9XkQ5
RT @paultgriffiths: I re-read this today, while waiting out a discussion on MS Teams, via @thepeerj - "10 rules for a successful remote pos…
I re-read this today, while waiting out a discussion on MS Teams, via @thepeerj - "10 rules for a successful remote postdoc" https://t.co/xnRDeOWUCO via @PeerJPreprints
"10 Simple Rules for Working Remotely." https://t.co/NSxHEEwd6z
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
RT @KRBurgio: Since it looks like remote work will be more common over the next few months, check out our "10 Simple Rules for a Successful…
RT @KRBurgio: Since it looks like remote work will be more common over the next few months, check out our "10 Simple Rules for a Successful…
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
RT @KRBurgio: Since it looks like remote work will be more common over the next few months, check out our "10 Simple Rules for a Successful…
RT @KRBurgio: Since it looks like remote work will be more common over the next few months, check out our "10 Simple Rules for a Successful…
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
RT @sMarten_Winter: Ten simple rules for a successful remote postdoc. https://t.co/DYz33t4ja4 & Best Practices for Virtual Participation…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Kevin R Burgio conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Caitlin McDonough MacKenzie conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Stephanie B Borrelle prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

S. K. Morgan Ernest authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jacquelyn L Gill authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Kurt E Ingeman prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Amy K Teffer authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Ethan P White authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Since this is an editorial article, there are no data or code associated with the creation of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s Data-Driven Discovery Initiative through grant GBMF4563 to EPW. CMM, SBB, KEI, and AKT are supported by the David H. Smith Conservation Research Fellowship, funded by the Cedar Tree Foundation and administered by the Society for Conservation Biology. AKT is also supported by a Mitacs Accelerate Fellowship (IT12751) co-sponsored by the Pacific Salmon Foundation and Genome British Columbia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies