Visitors   Views   Downloads

Fracture Table vs. Lateral Positioning for Intramedullary Fixation of Femur Fractures (The FLiP Study): A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

View preprint
27 days ago
Fracture Table vs. Lateral Positioning for Intramedullary Fixation of Femur Fractures (The FLiP Study): A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial https://t.co/9e7SULuPbs https://t.co/IFgNCbjYlJ
RT @Xenpaper: Fracture Table vs. Lateral Positioning for Intramedullary Fixation of Femur Fractures (The FLiP Study): A protocol for a pilo…
114 days ago
Fracture Table vs. Lateral Positioning for Intramedullary Fixation of Femur Fractures (The FLiP Study): A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial https://t.co/uj8q9HYKls https://t.co/8jW0JDrDDF
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Schematic and image of patient in the lateral position

View of the patient after draping in lateral position

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27875v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Daniel Axelrod conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Herman Johal conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Kim Madden conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Francesc Marcano conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Carlos Prada authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

As this is a protocol, we do not have any raw data available.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies