Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Western blot analysis of OLA1 in mouse oocyte meiosis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27837v1/supp-2

Knockdown efficiency of OLA1 after OLA1 siRNA was verified by western blot

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27837v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Di Xie conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Juan Zhang performed the experiments.

JinLi Ding performed the experiments.

Jing Yang conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Yan Zhang analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Animal experiments were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Hubei Research Center of Laboratory Animal (Approval ID: SYXK (Hubei) 2014-0082SCXK). Animals and all experimental procedures were performed according to the guidelines of the Committee of Animal Research Institute (General hospital of the Central Theater Command, China).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are provided in the supplementary files 1.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1000600 and 2018YFC1002804), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81571513) and the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFD0501701). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies