Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Juliana Tuller performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Karla Nunes Oliveira conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Jhonathan Oliveira Silva conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Maurício Lopes de Faria conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Mario Marcos do Espírito-Santo conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

José Eduardo Serrão wrote the paper.

José Cola Zanuncio wrote the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file.

Funding

This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG - Process EDT-318/05) and scholarships to Karla N. Oliveira (Probic-FAPEMIG), Jhonathan de O. Silva (Bic-UNIMONTES) and Mário Marcos do Espírito-Santo (BIPDT-FAPEMIG). To “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)” and “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies