NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Miguel Equihua Zamora analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Mariana Espinosa analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Carlos Gershenson authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Oliver López-Corona conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Mariana Munguia prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Octavio Pérez-Maqueo prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Elvia Ramírez-Carrillo analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Fisher Information algorithm: https://github.com/csunlab/fisher-information

Metolius data: https://lpdaacsvc.cr.usgs.gov/appeears/

Funding

This work was supported by CONACyT fund M0037-2018-07, number 296842; C\'atedras CONACyT fellowship program (project number 30); Sistema Nacional de Investigadores SNI, numbers 62929. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads