Interspecific differences of stridulatory signals in three species of bark beetles from the genus Polygraphus Er. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) inhabiting the island of Sakhalin

Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems SB RAS, Tomsk, Russian Federation
Department of Forestry and Landscape Construction, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.27697v2
Subject Areas
Animal Behavior, Entomology
Keywords
bark beetle, acoustic signals, stridulation, interspecific signals, chirp
Copyright
© 2019 Kerchev
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Kerchev IA. 2019. Interspecific differences of stridulatory signals in three species of bark beetles from the genus Polygraphus Er. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) inhabiting the island of Sakhalin. PeerJ Preprints 7:e27697v2

Abstract

Stridulatory signals are involved in conspecific interactions between bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae). In this study, we compared the qualitative profiles of acoustic signals in three species from the genus Polygraphus Er. Sympatry can be periodically observed in two of them – P. proximus and P. subopacus. Sporadically they occur on the same plants. P. nigrielytris colonize distinctly different host plant species; however, on the island of Sakhalin it inhabits the same biotopes. The purpose of the study is to identify species-specific parameters and the extent of differences in stridulatory signals of these species. Airborne signals produced during the contact of males of the same species were experimentally recorded. Among tested parameters of stridulatory signals, as the most species-specific were noted: chirp duration, number of tooth-strikes per chirp, and intertooth-strike interval.

Author Comment

In this article, significant changes were made to the recommendations of the reviewers. Important clarifications were made in the chapter materials and methods, data not presented in RAW data were excluded from the analysis, and the accompanying files themselves were added to the repository. An additional explanatory fig 2 has been added.