"Publication criteria should be based on evaluating study design, data quality, and scientific content—not statistical significance." of course, this makes sense when one is trained in rothman-sander school of thought :) https://t.co/Sl2he1o1ER via @PeerJPreprints
In response to Ioannidis (https://t.co/FcmjWDImbJ) - "The replication crisis in science is not the product of the publication of unreliable findings ... Rather, the replication crisis has arisen because unreliable findings are presented as reliable." https://t.co/DhP7Ck6wLi
"We also disagree that abandoning statistical significance will reduce science to “a state of statistical anarchy.” Indeed, @EpidemiologyLWW banned statistical significance in 1990 and is today recognized as a leader in the field" https://t.co/JYezDDLCMZ