The replication crisis in science is not the product of the publication of unreliable findings. The publication of unreliable findings is unavoidable.. Rather, the replication crisis has arisen because unreliable findings are presented as reliable. https://t.co/1UbHOqdRw2
“[...]Thus, researchers should report more, not less, providing estimates and uncertainty statements for all quantities, justifying any exceptions, and considering ways the results are wrong.. “https://t.co/pJDHR7FSAT
@JAMA_current I wonder if @JAMA_current , just as it opened its doors to Ioannidis' comment, will also open its pages for the response of @Lester_Domes et al.
Abandoning statistical significance is both sensible and practical. Valentin Amrhein, Andrew Gelman, Sander Greenland, Blakeley B McShane. [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/8OerG8HmNG