Visitors   Views   Downloads

Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: a validation study

View preprint
86 days ago
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
107 days ago
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
266 days ago
Looking forward to using this with #Cocites by @cecilejanssens https://t.co/RDlh43zlVJ
... he worked in a patent office during his golden years. Would I do it? For my work on - polygenic risk: probably not - new citation-based literature search method: was developed in the evening hours (https://t.co/wBIMSpAoOt) - my writings about methods: yes, much like now https://t.co/72MKPsC7XU
@famontellano Me too. We just finished a study that examined 500 SRs that all used PRISMA. 150 needed to be excluded for very basic reasons--not having bias assessment was #1. https://t.co/rnu1YkfFSh https://t.co/bn0FFq1PcY
315 days ago
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
330 days ago
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
336 days ago
CoCites would be very useful for the research I've been doing. Hope it will be made publicly available in the near future! => Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: a validation study https://t.co/TPgREPlnqo
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
344 days ago
RT @cecilejanssens: This might well be the most amazing project that I have ever worked on: the validation of a new method for searching sc…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplementary file

This file includes supplementary figures and tables.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27646v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

ACJWJ has filed a patent application for the method described in this article. MG, JEB, KP, MG declare no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Cecile Janssens conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Marta Gwinn authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

J. Elaine Brockman performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Kimberley Powell authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Michael Goodman authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Our submission is a preprint posting. We will share the data upon final acceptance of our paper.

Funding

Financial support by the National Library of Medicine (R01-LM012372). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies