Visitors   Views   Downloads

You’re better than you think you are: A comparison of lecturer and student rated evaluations of teaching on a Professional Doctorate training programme

View preprint
You’re better than you think you are - Concordance paper https://t.co/rzaOz4YuOp via @PeerJPreprints
23 days ago
You’re better than you think you are: A comparison of lecturer and student rated evaluations of teaching on a Professional Doctorate training programme https://t.co/WCMmfiXy5c https://t.co/FdLjTxKf7I
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Bob Patton is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Bob Patton conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The University of Surrey Ethics Committee gave a favourable ethical opinion to carry out this study (ref: FT-PSY-545-17)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data will be uploaded to Research Gate

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies