Gender and other potential biases in peer review: Analysis of 38,250 external peer review reports

RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Martins et al: The gender gap observed in univariable analysis was explained by differences in age, research topics and affiliations. https://t.co/hDoZUGw7cn https://t.co/qhEePvBfGW
Potential bias in peer review of grant applications at the Swiss National Science Foundation https://t.co/YZCTjZL0nI https://t.co/3QTN0L0558
2507 days ago
Potential bias in peer review of grant applications at the Swiss National Science Foundation https://t.co/xQz9aCzuTB https://t.co/V60Cv5XDIy
RT @annasvrn: New preprint published! We investigated potential biases related to gender, country of affiliation and source of reviewer nom…
2507 days ago
RT @annasvrn: New preprint published! We investigated potential biases related to gender, country of affiliation and source of reviewer nom…
2507 days ago
New preprint published! We investigated potential biases related to gender, country of affiliation and source of reviewer nomination in the @snsf_ch peer review of research grant applications. Read it here: https://t.co/SdvEJ1gxYi @PeerJ #peerreview #genderbias #leakypipeline https://t.co/Yfi67vhWWQ