Gender and other potential biases in peer review: Analysis of 38,250 external peer review reports

View preprint
RT @annasvrn: New preprint published! We investigated potential biases related to gender, country of affiliation and source of reviewer nom…
reply repost on X like
RT @hug_sven: Large scale study on bias in grant peer review finds gender bias which *almost* disappears when controlling for research fiel…
reply repost on X like
Intéressant de noter que des biais plus importants sont p.ex. observables au niveau de la nationalité des reviewers https://t.co/ChJzzjiSYf
reply repost on X like
1858 days ago
RT @PeerJPreprints: Preprint: Potential bias in peer review of grant applications at the Swiss National Science Foundation https://t.co/0LB…
reply repost on X like
Preprint: Potential bias in peer review of grant applications at the Swiss National Science Foundation https://t.co/0LBJnkDevk #sciencepolicy https://t.co/9AIRfx4QE0
reply repost on X like
Potential bias in peer review at SNSF https://t.co/IdLTjzkHhS via @PeerJPreprints
reply repost on X like
1862 days ago
RT @giva_uzh: ...and the numbers will leave you gasping, Figure 5 supplemental info
reply repost on X like
RT @giva_uzh: ...and the numbers will leave you gasping, Figure 5 supplemental info
reply repost on X like
RT @annasvrn: New preprint published! We investigated potential biases related to gender, country of affiliation and source of reviewer nom…
reply repost on X like
1863 days ago
RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
reply repost on X like
1863 days ago
RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
reply repost on X like
RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
reply repost on X like
RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
reply repost on X like
RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
reply repost on X like
RT @eggersnsf: Out in @PeerJPreprints: Analysis of 38250 peer review reports of 12294 @snsf_ch grant applications by @annasvrn, João Marti…
reply repost on X like
RT @bo_wolff: Potential bias in peer review of grant applications at the Swiss National Science Foundation [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/b…
reply repost on X like
RT @schopfel: Potential bias in peer review at the Swiss National Science Foundation @SNSF #openscience https://t.co/2B5QYQyAsy via @PeerJP…
reply repost on X like
Potential bias in peer review at the Swiss National Science Foundation @SNSF #openscience https://t.co/2B5QYQyAsy via @PeerJPreprints
reply repost on X like
Potential bias in peer review of grant applications at the Swiss National Science Foundation [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/bHbn8TqTml
reply repost on X like
RT @annasvrn: @eggersnsf @larsjuhljensen @markrobinsonca @rachelhey3 The corrected version can now be found at https://t.co/mpdg7Omf5T.
reply repost on X like
1864 days ago
RT @corminboeuf_lab: Unsurprising bias at the Swiss NSF "For the younger age groups, female applicants consistently received lower evaluati…
reply repost on X like
1864 days ago
@eggersnsf @larsjuhljensen @markrobinsonca @rachelhey3 The corrected version can now be found at https://t.co/mpdg7Omf5T.
reply repost on X like
RT @corminboeuf_lab: Unsurprising bias at the Swiss NSF "For the younger age groups, female applicants consistently received lower evaluati…
reply repost on X like
RT @EffyVayena: The ⁦@snsf_ch⁩ is studying their review practices and changing policies! Potential bias in peer review of grant application…
reply repost on X like
RT @annasvrn: New preprint published! We investigated potential biases related to gender, country of affiliation and source of reviewer nom…
reply repost on X like