NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Coefficient of variation of common dolphin density estimates in the English Channel

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27569v1/supp-2

Coefficient of variation of common dolphin density estimates in the Celtic Sea

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27569v1/supp-3

Coefficient of variation of common dolphin density estimates in the Bay of Biscay

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27569v1/supp-4

Plot of the GAM smooth fit of abundance with distance to coast in the Bay of Biscay

The solid line represents the best fit, with the grey shaded area representing the 95% confidence intervals. Vertical lines on the x-axis are the observed data values.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27569v1/supp-5

Plot of the GAM smooth fit of abundance with depth in the Bay of Biscay

The solid line represents the best fit, with the grey shaded area representing the 95% confidence intervals, which are wide throughout. Vertical lines on the x-axis are the observed data values.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27569v1/supp-6

Plot of the GAM smooth fit of abundance with chlorophyll concentration in the Celtic Sea

The solid line represents the best fit, with the grey shaded area representing the 95% confidence intervals which widen with increasing concentrations. Vertical lines on the x-axis are the observed data values.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27569v1/supp-7

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

James R Robbins conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Lucy Babey conceived and designed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Clare B Embling conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All observations were recorded from a platform of opportunity. No animals were disturbed beyond the typical amount caused by large ferries, and therefore no special permits were required.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data collected and used in this paper are available on Mendeley Data, with DOI: 10.17632/czc6b3p366.1 and at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/czc6b3p366/1

Funding

Work was funded by ORCA with membership fees and donations going directly towards the work of the charity and this research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads