NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Density and biomass from year 2012 to 2015

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27528v1/supp-1

Physicochemical parameters from year 2012 to 2015

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27528v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Beijuan Hu analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Xuren Hu performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Xue Nie performed the experiments.

Xiaoke Zhang authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Naicheng Wu analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Yijiang Hong contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Hai Ming Qin conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data of zooplankton density and biomass are provided in the supplementary files 1. The raw data shows the density (ind./L) and corresponding biomass (mg/L) data for all species in each repeat samples.

The raw data of synchronously determined physicochemical factors are provided in the supplementary files 2.

Funding

This project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31560133, 41501028), International Crane Foundation (11001903) and Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, Nanchang University (13006457). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads