Visitors   Views   Downloads

Shared genomic outliers across two divergent population clusters of a highly threatened seagrass

View preprint
140 days ago
RT @vonderHeydenlab: Great preprint online today from @phair_nikki @ToBoLab on the #genomics of #Zostera capensis across southern and Easte…
RT @vonderHeydenlab: Great preprint online today from @phair_nikki @ToBoLab on the #genomics of #Zostera capensis across southern and Easte…
RT @vonderHeydenlab: Great preprint online today from @phair_nikki @ToBoLab on the #genomics of #Zostera capensis across southern and Easte…
RT @vonderHeydenlab: Great preprint online today from @phair_nikki @ToBoLab on the #genomics of #Zostera capensis across southern and Easte…
RT @vonderHeydenlab: Great preprint online today from @phair_nikki @ToBoLab on the #genomics of #Zostera capensis across southern and Easte…
RT @vonderHeydenlab: Great preprint online today from @phair_nikki @ToBoLab on the #genomics of #Zostera capensis across southern and Easte…
RT @vonderHeydenlab: Great preprint online today from @phair_nikki @ToBoLab on the #genomics of #Zostera capensis across southern and Easte…
201 days ago
Shared genomic outliers across two divergent population clusters of a highly threatened seagrass https://t.co/4ylPd4XvK5 https://t.co/PqxicSAtxf
Great preprint online today from @phair_nikki @ToBoLab on the #genomics of #Zostera capensis across southern and Eastern Africa! Two clusters driven by frequency differences in outliers, shaped in part by historical climate variation. https://t.co/JtQ4HtBdMB #seagrass https://t.co/tYKh5ez8f3
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplementary mathods, figures and tables

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27517v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Robert Toonen is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Nikki Leanne Phair conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Robert John Toonen contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Ingrid Knapp performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, sequencing library preparation.

Sophie von der Heyden conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The collection of plant material was approved by SanParks and Cape Nature (permit number 0028-AAA008-00159), DAFF and DEA (permit number was RES2014/103).

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

These data are stored in the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s (NCBI’s) Sequence Read Archive (SRA; PRJNA503110) and georeferenced at GeOMe at the project: Zostera capensis pooled RADseq. To access the data go to https://geome-db.org/query and look for "Zostera capensis pooled Rad-seq" under the drop down list

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Our raw data is in the form of genetic sequences, which are deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s (NCBI’s) Sequence Read Archive (SRA; PRJNA503110). The programmes and methods used to analyses these data are described in the text.

Funding

This study was supported by the South African National Research Foundation (NRF) through a Scarce Skills Doctoral Scholarship to NP, the Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association (WIOMSA) through the MARG I grant to SvdH and NSF OA #1416889 to RJT. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies