NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Tables S1, S2, S3 and S4

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27499v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Andrew J Low conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Adam G Koziol conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Paul A Manninger performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Burton W Blais conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Catherine D Carrillo conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

Raw data have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under BioProject PRJNA507762. The accession numbers and strain descriptions are listed in the Supplemental Table S1.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw WGS data have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under BioProject PRJNA507762. The accession numbers and strain descriptions are listed in the Supplemental Table S1.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA507762

Code for ConFindr is freely available at

https://github.com/OLC-Bioinformatics/ConFindr.

Funding

This work was funded by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (OLC-F-1803). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads