Visitors   Views   Downloads

Statistical heartburn: An attempt to digest four pizza publications from the Cornell Food and Brand Lab

View preprint
14 days ago
@afbdijkstra Inderdaad. En het is niet gewoon 1 paper waarbij hij in de mist ging en bij de correctie weer in de mist ging. Het is gewoon structureel fout bij hem. https://t.co/z6Z4dHOKpY
16 days ago
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
41 days ago
RT @Research_Tim: In the Top 5 most viewed papers on @thePeerJ! "Statistical heartburn", a case study in post-publication peer-review by…
In the Top 5 most viewed papers on @thePeerJ! "Statistical heartburn", a case study in post-publication peer-review by @sTeamTraen, @OmnesResNetwork, and me. Link: https://t.co/eZPsQ1AyHK. We identified & corrected over 150 errors in just 4 papers by the @CUFood_BrandLab.
48 days ago
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
I dont think we can throw away the portion size theory yet. I think there is a difference between Wasnik duplicating publications as opposed to faking results -but this un peer-reviewed critique does question the reported stats and quality of the science https://t.co/dtwAbSeaQn https://t.co/M4IpuQaEFc
118 days ago
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
Reanalysis of 4 papers by Wansink et al. #ResearchMethods class https://t.co/PKIEHcdQWa via @PeerJPreprints
Granularity problem example: See p5 Table1 last column: https://t.co/3Q2VMy44xc The mean of ten integers cannot possibly be 3.92
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
197 days ago
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
223 days ago
@Research_Tim @tcarpenter216 My read on #5 -- has DOI, but no Issue/Page number. Perhaps I'm misreading. For #7, this link https://t.co/lX7zHDfbZM is what I saw.
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
@Julie_B92 @mrtnj I'm not a good person, I ruined someone's career: https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
RT @pzazue: @Vinncent great article. Only that "men eat more" study (and most of the Cornell food lab studies) are highly questionable http…
RT @pzazue: @Vinncent great article. Only that "men eat more" study (and most of the Cornell food lab studies) are highly questionable http…
RT @pzazue: @Vinncent great article. Only that "men eat more" study (and most of the Cornell food lab studies) are highly questionable http…
RT @pzazue: @Vinncent great article. Only that "men eat more" study (and most of the Cornell food lab studies) are highly questionable http…
263 days ago
@Vinncent great article. Only that "men eat more" study (and most of the Cornell food lab studies) are highly questionable https://t.co/aBJi1oa07e
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

TvdZ has a blog entitled ”The Skeptical Scientist” at timvanderzee.com. JA operates omnesres.com, oncolnc.org, and prepubmed.org. NJLB has a blog at sTeamTraen.blogspot.com that hosts advertising; his earnings in 2016 were 3.88 euros.

Author Contributions

Tim van der Zee analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jordan Anaya analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nicholas J L Brown analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

1) GitHub

2) pizzapizza

3) https://github.com/OmnesRes/pizzapizza

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies