Statistical heartburn: An attempt to digest four pizza publications from the Cornell Food and Brand Lab

Nothing to see here, folks. Keep moving along... https://t.co/QC1meJKmQP https://t.co/isLSbDmDfl
@ADAlthousePhD My coauthors were concerned our preprint wouldn't count until actually published, but it seems the downloads and altmetric for the preprint are a lot higher than the published version: https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU https://t.co/1i4Uur6JQs
999 days ago
RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…
999 days ago
RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…
RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…
RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…
RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…
1001 days ago
RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…
RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…
RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…
RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…
1002 days ago
So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change their minds about preprints. #peerj @ASAPbio_ @medrxivpreprint @OSFramework @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/IE3oOu84JU @jsross119 https://t.co/8di3QNzXsq
Interesting. A blog post about “a student who never said no” got this ball rolling? • https://t.co/9crqlCyifv • https://t.co/V1s1WLYawz https://t.co/LjmKFUPdee
@ADAlthousePhD In the comments to our preprint (and through emails) multiple people pointed out some of our typos. I didn't think it was worth giving readers a new version to check for changes just to fix those. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
@machinestarts Same team, Lead by Wansink. It's publishable b/c it conforms to our pre-existing views (e.g. social media companies make lots of money surely this is because they have addictive products) but has no scientific merit. https://t.co/HYynxFr141
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
@farid_anvari Is there a mentor who would have let me drop everything to work on this? https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
1180 days ago
@TimHarford @doctorow For example: https://t.co/GDLLpEaMfz
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
RT @AndyDHigginson: How did this professor get his hundreds of papers past peer review? Partial answer is poor stats training of life scien…
How did this professor get his hundreds of papers past peer review? Partial answer is poor stats training of life scientists. My favourite stats "blooper": degrees of freedom larger than sample size... https://t.co/rvGCECA255 https://t.co/lhuYaO4v5h
1230 days ago
@afbdijkstra Inderdaad. En het is niet gewoon 1 paper waarbij hij in de mist ging en bij de correctie weer in de mist ging. Het is gewoon structureel fout bij hem. https://t.co/z6Z4dHOKpY
1232 days ago
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU