world, hello (threaded) @michael_at_work 2562 days ago

Nothing to see here, folks. Keep moving along... https://t.co/QC1meJKmQP https://t.co/isLSbDmDfl

Jordan Anaya @OmnesResNetwork 2582 days ago

@ADAlthousePhD My coauthors were concerned our preprint wouldn't count until actually published, but it seems the downloads and altmetric for the preprint are a lot higher than the published version: https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU https://t.co/1i4Uur6JQs

Eduardo Fox @ofoxofox 2599 days ago

RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…

ASAPbio @ASAPbio_ 2599 days ago

RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…

Fabien Campagne @FabienCampagne 2600 days ago

RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…

PeerJ Preprints @PeerJPreprints 2600 days ago

RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…

ilovebenefits @ilovebenefits 2601 days ago

RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…

Andrew Foy @AndrewFoy82 2601 days ago

RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…

Ashley Farley @ashleydfarley 2601 days ago

RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…

Leon Gussow @poisonreview 2602 days ago

RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…

Rahat Warraich PhD @rahatheart1 2602 days ago

RT @hmkyale: So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change th…

Harlan Krumholz @hmkyale 2602 days ago

So interesting that the @JAMA_current retractions of the Wansink articles… started with a #preprint. Maybe this will change their minds about preprints. #peerj @ASAPbio_ @medrxivpreprint @OSFramework @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/IE3oOu84JU @jsross119 https://t.co/8di3QNzXsq

Loft Experience @loftexperience 2604 days ago

Interesting. A blog post about “a student who never said no” got this ball rolling? • https://t.co/9crqlCyifv • https://t.co/V1s1WLYawz https://t.co/LjmKFUPdee

Jordan Anaya @OmnesResNetwork 2670 days ago

@ADAlthousePhD In the comments to our preprint (and through emails) multiple people pointed out some of our typos. I didn't think it was worth giving readers a new version to check for changes just to fix those. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU

Andrew Przybylski @ShuhBillSkee 2682 days ago

@machinestarts Same team, Lead by Wansink. It's publishable b/c it conforms to our pre-existing views (e.g. social media companies make lots of money surely this is because they have addictive products) but has no scientific merit. https://t.co/HYynxFr141

James C.Coyne @CoyneoftheRealm 2734 days ago

RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU

Jordan Anaya @OmnesResNetwork 2762 days ago

@farid_anvari Is there a mentor who would have let me drop everything to work on this? https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU

Alasdair @AlasdairClarke 2780 days ago

@TimHarford @doctorow For example: https://t.co/GDLLpEaMfz

Randall Parker @futurepundit 2809 days ago

RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU

PeerReviewBotter @Peer__Reviewer 2810 days ago

RT @AndyDHigginson: How did this professor get his hundreds of papers past peer review? Partial answer is poor stats training of life scien…

Andy D Higginson @AndyDHigginson 2810 days ago

How did this professor get his hundreds of papers past peer review? Partial answer is poor stats training of life scientists. My favourite stats "blooper": degrees of freedom larger than sample size... https://t.co/rvGCECA255 https://t.co/lhuYaO4v5h

Casper Albers @CaAl 2830 days ago

@afbdijkstra Inderdaad. En het is niet gewoon 1 paper waarbij hij in de mist ging en bij de correctie weer in de mist ging. Het is gewoon structureel fout bij hem. https://t.co/z6Z4dHOKpY

sconvers @sconvers 2832 days ago

RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU

Jérémy L-Besnard @JLefort_Besnard 2841 days ago

RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU

Emil OW Kirkegaard @KirkegaardEmil 2841 days ago

RT @OmnesResNetwork: Our preprint has 5,000 downloads. And 0 authors with a PhD. https://t.co/kbHtTVFDlU