Visitors   Views   Downloads

The complete chloroplast genome of Fagus crenata (subgenus Fagus) and comparison with F. engleriana (subgenus Engleriana)

View preprint
38 days ago
The complete chloroplast genome of Fagus crenata (subgenus Fagus) and comparison with F. engleriana (subgenus Engleriana) https://t.co/CbrekzftZo https://t.co/0PgRm6r0ne
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Details of all the 104 chloroplast SSRs identified in Fagus crenata and F. engleriana including their position in the alignment of the two genomes, length and repeat motif type

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27473v1/supp-1

Genbank file of the whole chloroplast genome of Fagus crenata

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27473v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

James Worth conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Luxian Liu conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Nobuhiro Tomaru conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

MH171101

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw data consists of sequence uploaded to GenBank.

Funding

This work was supported by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists A (Grant number 16748931); and a Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute grant (Gant number 201430). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies