Visitors   Views   Downloads

Journal retractions in oncology – a bibliometric study

View preprint
@larshaakon @JAMAOnc We've looked at this in oncology - and the good news is that the article lifetime (gap between publication and retraction) is trending down. See our preprint: https://t.co/HvoKYWu5jO
RT @AnticancerOrgUK: A new preprint from myself and @lydie_meheus on retracted publications in oncology. Scientific fraud is a problem in a…
RT @sergio_crispino: Journal retractions in oncology – a bibliometric study [PeerJ Preprints]. The number of retracted articles in oncolog…
Journal retractions in oncology – a bibliometric study [PeerJ Preprints]. The number of retracted articles in oncology is on an upward trajectory @myESMO @ASCO @CancerworldESO @ESOncology @eupatientsforum @AIOMtweet @ASTRO_org @ESSOnews @ESTRO_RT https://t.co/T03UCrPzZI
RT @AnticancerOrgUK: A new preprint from myself and @lydie_meheus on retracted publications in oncology. Scientific fraud is a problem in a…
RT @Xenpaper: Journal retractions in oncology – a bibliometric study https://t.co/w7y6yVWkg7
A new preprint from myself and @lydie_meheus on retracted publications in oncology. Scientific fraud is a problem in all areas of science, including cancer research. https://t.co/HvoKYWu5jO
253 days ago
Journal retractions in oncology – a bibliometric study https://t.co/w7y6yVWkg7
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Data set of journal retractions and retraction notices in oncology

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27427v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Pan Pantziarka and Lydie Meheus are employed by the Anticancer Fund. Pan Pantziarka is the Chairperson of The George Pantziarka TP53 Trust.

Author Contributions

Pan Pantziarka conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Lydie Meheus conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

An Excel workbook containing a dataset of journal retractions and retraction notices.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies