1 Citation   Views   Downloads

Academic publishing empires need to go

View preprint
RT @jlehtoma: @eklund_jo @TuuliToivonen @ConBiology You can read the preprint of our original comment in @thePeerJ Preprints: https://t.co…
305 days ago
Academic Publishing Empires Need to Go https://t.co/5MT6DB5nDK
@CharlesOppenh I'll leave the persuasiveness for the reader to decide, but once again, you can find the main arguments in the preprint: https://t.co/XaKETbuLSN
RT @jlehtoma: @eklund_jo @TuuliToivonen @ConBiology You can read the preprint of our original comment in @thePeerJ Preprints: https://t.co…
RT @jlehtoma: @eklund_jo @TuuliToivonen @ConBiology You can read the preprint of our original comment in @thePeerJ Preprints: https://t.co…
RT @RickyPo: @lisalibrarian @CharlesOppenh Perhaps this is the preprint? https://t.co/UBdtCyRLn6 @eklund_jo
RT @RickyPo: @lisalibrarian @CharlesOppenh Perhaps this is the preprint? https://t.co/UBdtCyRLn6 @eklund_jo
@eklund_jo @TuuliToivonen @ConBiology You can read the preprint of our original comment in @thePeerJ Preprints: https://t.co/XaKETbuLSN We opted not to go for #OA in a hybrid journal and intend to make the author's post print version available #GreenOA after a 12 months embargo. 2/2
@lisalibrarian The original submitted comment is available as a preprint (https://t.co/FEyiBmR5Lh) and though not exactly the same as the published version, it does contain our main points 2/2
@lisalibrarian @CharlesOppenh Perhaps this is the preprint? https://t.co/UBdtCyRLn6 @eklund_jo
RT @eklund_jo: About to discuss #openaccess issues and #PlanS tomorrow @ICCB2019 with some of the main editors in the conservation field. S…
RT @eklund_jo: About to discuss #openaccess issues and #PlanS tomorrow @ICCB2019 with some of the main editors in the conservation field. S…
About to discuss #openaccess issues and #PlanS tomorrow @ICCB2019 with some of the main editors in the conservation field. See our response to Burgman et al.´s editorial here: https://t.co/cvRK7M62LL, older preprint version available here: https://t.co/NS1yXazRdr #ICCB2019 https://t.co/r5kKWzLED2
RT @jlehtoma: Our comment "Academic publishing empires need to go" with @eklund_jo and @TuuliToivonen was one of the top 5 most viewed #Con…
RT @jlehtoma: Our comment "Academic publishing empires need to go" with @eklund_jo and @TuuliToivonen was one of the top 5 most viewed #Con…
#The120DaysOfWisdom 7/ Pls academics discussing "authors-pay" vs "readers-pay" models: out of ivory tower and behind the paywalls are legions of potential READERS, not authors (e.g. my insect-crazy Mum & all medical, social etc. staff everywhere on Earth) https://t.co/CTsw7ZpsDT
RT @jlehtoma: Our comment "Academic publishing empires need to go" with @eklund_jo and @TuuliToivonen was one of the top 5 most viewed #Con…
500 days ago
RT @jlehtoma: Our comment "Academic publishing empires need to go" with @eklund_jo and @TuuliToivonen was one of the top 5 most viewed #Con…
RT @jlehtoma: Our comment "Academic publishing empires need to go" with @eklund_jo and @TuuliToivonen was one of the top 5 most viewed #Con…
RT @jlehtoma: Our comment "Academic publishing empires need to go" with @eklund_jo and @TuuliToivonen was one of the top 5 most viewed #Con…
Our comment "Academic publishing empires need to go" with @eklund_jo and @TuuliToivonen was one of the top 5 most viewed #ConservationBiology preprints published in @thePeerJ journal in 2018. https://t.co/MvmSihfX5i Still time to give feedback on #Plan_S unti Feb 9th!
Among other lofty claims, this article makes getting authors to email paywalled articles look easy
RT @FishConGen: Academic publishing empires need to go. A response from @jlehtoma @eklund_jo & @TuuliToivonen to Burgman M. 2018. Open acce…
RT @heidiklaine: "We highlight that the current guidelines of #PlanS are open for comment [...]. Instead of calling for a more nuanced appr…
RT @heidiklaine: "We highlight that the current guidelines of #PlanS are open for comment [...]. Instead of calling for a more nuanced appr…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Joona Lehtomäki currently works for the Academy of Finland (Research Councils Finland) which is a member of cOAlition S (consortium behind Plan S). Previous to 2017-08-01, he worked as a researcher at the University of Helsinki and VU Amsterdam with multiple open science related projects. He is also a founding member of the open science working group at Open Knowledge Finland, a non-profit NGO (his affiliation as an author for this comment).

Author Contributions

Joona Lehtomäki conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Johanna Eklund conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tuuli Toivonen conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

No raw data/code was used in this commentary.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies