Visitors   Views   Downloads

The neurodevelopmental trajectory of Borderline Personality Disorder: a review

View preprint
RT @IrisVilares: Very proud of my UCL master student Siobhan who just submitted her first preprint! On the neurodevelopmental trajectory in…
Very proud of my UCL master student Siobhan who just submitted her first preprint! On the neurodevelopmental trajectory in BorPD: @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Ndd10uDOTQ #Neuroscience #PsychiatryandPsychology Suggestions welcome!
11 days ago
The neurodevelopmental trajectory of Borderline Personality Disorder: a review https://t.co/ePZMmSeGeF
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Figure 1: PRISMA flow diagram of the search and selection methods

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27414v1/supp-2

Table 1: Summary of the aims, results and limitations of the selected articles

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27414v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Siobhan R Edinboro conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables.

Tobias Nolte authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Iris Vilares conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The manuscript is in the form of a literature review and so, there is no raw data associated with this work.

Funding

Siobhan Edinboro received no funding for this work. Tobias Nolte is funded by a Wellcome Trust Principle Investigator Award to P. Read Montague, and Iris Vilares was also funded previously by the same Award. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies