Visitors   Views   Downloads

Dysregulation of RNA editing may help explain pathogenicity mechanisms of congenital Zika syndrome and Guillain-Barre syndrome

View preprint
@duffy_ma @umichsph Interesting work! The host immune response is very important, indeed. We have a hypothesis about host immunity's role in congenital #Zika defects (and GBS, don't forget adults). See our @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/xOfouQc6dg
225 days ago
Dysregulation of RNA editing may help explain pathogenicity mechanisms of congenital Zika syndrome and Guillain-Barre syndrome https://t.co/FhJY9suqn2
Dysregulation of RNA editing may help explain pathogenicity mechanisms of congenital Zika syndrome and Guillain-Barre syndrome https://t.co/v4g7na9y74 Many Zika virus (ZIKV) pathogenesis-related studies have focused primarily on virus-driven pathology and neurotoxicity…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Helen Piontkivska conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Noel-Marie Plonski analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Michael M Miyamoto prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Marta L Wayne prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Not applicable

Funding

This work was partially supported Kent State University Research Council Seed Award, and Brain Health Institute Pilot Award to HP. MLW was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant number GM083192. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies