NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Presence of Asian elephant and corresponding variables

raw data

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27397v1/supp-1

Pseudo-absence of Asian elephant and corresponding variables

raw data

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27397v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Cheng Huang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Xueyou Li conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Laxman Khanal authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Xuelong Jiang conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Field works were approved by Yunnan Forestry and Grassland Administration.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data/code is included in the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Programme of Chinese Academy of Sciences [Category A #] and Wildlife Conservation Programme of Yunnan, China. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads