Visitors   Views   Downloads

Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct

View preprint
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
18 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
18 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @OpenScienceR: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/YZeuhixuBq https://t.co/5wxzg1BqoX
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/ksvhpA59nZ via @PeerJPreprints
RT @OpenScienceR: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/YZeuhixuBq https://t.co/5wxzg1BqoX
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/YZeuhixuBq https://t.co/5wxzg1BqoX
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t…
This is brilliant: Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct https://t.co/fS3tjw6du1 (cc @BrianNosek) https://t.co/kfY9xQdyJM
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

John Timmer is employee of Conde Nast / Ars Technica.

Author Contributions

Nicolas P Rougier authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

John Timmer authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code (review).

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies