Testing the hypothesis that routine sea ice coverage of 3-5 mkm2 results in a greater than 30% decline in population size of polar bears (Ursus maritimus)
Streisand effect from Harvey et al. Bioscience attack paper on myself and other science blogs [a failed #tantrumpaper]: downloads of my #polarbear #seaice paper hit 1850 this morning - up from about 500 in early November https://t.co/gBveassiX1 Happy New Year everyone https://t.co/dm5cLcMEZw
@CarbonBrief Biased out-of-date #polarbear 'expert' talking points from Carbon Brief (> 2 years old) does not refute the science I point out in my 2017 paper (Crockford 2017) https://t.co/prBw00Zp1Z : after 10 yrs of low summer #seaice bear numbers are up or stable
@AEDerocher resorts to using "denier" 3X in one sentence because he can't refute the #polarbear #seaice science in this fully referenced academic paper https://t.co/gBveassiX1 Hyperbolic name-calling ["polar bear climate denier in chief"] is just childish foot-stomping https://t.co/1A20xZUzHT