Visitors   Views   Downloads

The unfolding of iRFP713 in a crowded milieu

View preprint
24 days ago
The unfolding of iRFP713 in a crowded milieu https://t.co/xYHAuICgiA
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

detail procedure of protein expression and purification and a description of a determination of volume fraction of crowders

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27368v1/supp-2

raw data presented on the figures 1-9

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27368v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Konstantin K. Turoverov is an Academic Editor for PeerJ. Irina M. Kuznetsova is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Olesya V. Stepanenko conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Olga V Stepanenko conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Irina M. Kuznetsova conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Konstantin K Turoverov conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is provided as a supplemental file.

Funding

This work was supported by the “Molecular and Cell Biology” Program of the Russian Academy of Sciences (K.K.T.) and the Government of Saint-Petersburg (No 44) (O.V.S.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies