NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Additive Figure The process of embryonic development of Scapholeberis mucronata O. F. Müler

1~2.One-cell stage; 3. Membrane lift; 4. 2-cell stage;5. 4-cell stage; 6. 8-cell stage;7. Multi-cell stage; 8. Blastula stage; 9. Gastrula stage; 10. Formation of "T" type embryo; 11. Formation of antenna rudiment; 12. Formation of pereiopod rudiment; 13. Formation of 2-compound eye; 14. Single compound eye stage; 15~16. Membrane rive; 17. Expel from matrix; 18. Parthenogenetic female; 19. Ephippial female; 20. Ephippium

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27367v1/supp-1

The raw data and plot data for this study

The raw data and plot data file was upload as the supplemental file.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27367v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Lei Wang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Wen Zhao conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Yuanzi Huo performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Xuwang Yin analyzed the data.

Jie Wei performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Shan Wang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in the supplementary files Tab. S1.

Funding

This study was supported by Special Program for Key Basic Research of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (No. 2014FY210700). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads