Visitors   Views   Downloads

Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human behavior

View preprint
211 days ago
Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human behavior https://t.co/2uccbGiBNj https://t.co/arbIh2rgQ7
RT @DieterLukas: New preprint: "Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human sociality." By @AnnePisor, @Mat…
590 days ago
RT @DieterLukas: New preprint: "Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human sociality." By @AnnePisor, @Mat…
RT @DieterLukas: New preprint: "Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human sociality." By @AnnePisor, @Mat…
590 days ago
RT @DieterLukas: New preprint: "Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human sociality." By @AnnePisor, @Mat…
New preprint: "Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human sociality." By @AnnePisor, @MatthewMGervais, @BGPurzycki, @mindismoving - about what we can infer about the behavior of people "in the real world" - https://t.co/deUQRJ2BkG
594 days ago
Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human sociality https://t.co/kleC7X26F7
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Anne C Pisor prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Matthew M Gervais authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Benjamin G Purzycki authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Cody T Ross conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All field protocols were approved by the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, and declared exempt from additional IRB oversight.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The code and data used are available on GitHub at www.github.com/ctross/preferencesandconstraints.

Funding

The data analyzed here were collected with support from the Department of Human Behavior, Ecology, and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies