NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Justification of the paper

The rationale for conducting the meta-analysis; The contribution that the meta-analysis makes to knowledge in light of previously published related reports, including other meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27352v3/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Carlos Giovanny Hidalgo Suarez conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Miguel Eduardo Guevara Burbano conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Victor Andres Bucheli Guerrero conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Pedro Antonio Moreno Tovar conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, in the discussion: the comparison between the most used programming languages ​​in genomics.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://github.com/cgiohidalgo/vighub

Funding

This work was supported by the Universidad del Valle, Faculty of Engineering, Systems and Computer Engineering School and the research project: "Platform in omics sciences and health of breast cancer in southwestern Colombia" of the general system of royalties of Valle del Cauca, Colombia, BPIN 2013000100297". In addition, we have the support of "Fundación CEIBA-Nariño". The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads