Visitors   Views   Downloads

Evaluation of criteria for meaningful Aboriginal consultation in Canada during environmental assessment

View preprint
RT @tonyrwalker1: @emileeguevara @PeterShepherd8 @NatObserver You can never consult enough. More is always better. “Evaluation of criteria…
@emileeguevara @PeterShepherd8 @NatObserver You can never consult enough. More is always better. “Evaluation of criteria for meaningful Aboriginal consultation in Canada during environmental assessment” https://t.co/eVfYxeIyVj
628 days ago
Evaluation of criteria for meaningful Aboriginal consultation in Canada during environmental assessment https://t.co/Yz4amTq6mU
Aboriginal consultation in EA in Canada https://t.co/eVfYxeIyVj via @PeerJPreprints
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Tony R Walker conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code.

Funding

The author received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies