Visitors   Views   Downloads

The joint economic impact level (jEIL): a decision metric for integrated pest and pollinator management

View preprint
RT @phytomonster: For those working at the interface of crop #pollination and #IPM/sustainable pest control, we are happy to share details…
RT @phytomonster: For those working at the interface of crop #pollination and #IPM/sustainable pest control, we are happy to share details…
For those working at the interface of crop #pollination and #IPM/sustainable pest control, we are happy to share details of a new unified decision support metric for integrated mgmt: https://t.co/dX3mSoyXls @Stenberg_JA
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Adam Flöhr conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Johan A. Stenberg contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Paul A. Egan conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

This study contains no original raw data, and the data sources used are cited in the text (in the Empirical Example section).

Funding

This work was funded by the Swedish Research Council Formas, grant no. 2017-02170 (awarded to Paul A. Egan), and grant no. 2016-00223 (awarded to Johan A. Stenberg). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies