Differential drivers of chemical defenses in three widespread pine species along a 1500-m elevational gradient: a test of the elevational gradient in plant defense hypothesis

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States
Southwestern Biological Sciences Center, United States Geological Survey, Moab, Utah, United States
Department of Chemistry, Seattle University, Seattle, WA, United States
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.2733v1
Subject Areas
Climate Change Biology, Ecology, Entomology, Natural Resource Management, Plant Science
Keywords
Pinus, monoterpenes, plant defenses, conifer, climate, elevational gradient, chemical ecology, resin
Copyright
© 2017 Ferrenberg et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Ferrenberg S, Langenhan JM, Loskot SA, Rozal LM, Mitton JB. 2017. Differential drivers of chemical defenses in three widespread pine species along a 1500-m elevational gradient: a test of the elevational gradient in plant defense hypothesis. PeerJ Preprints 5:e2733v1

Abstract

1. The elevational gradient in plant defense (EGPD) hypothesis posits that natural enemy pressures increase positively alongside temperature across elevational climatic gradients, thereby selecting for enhanced defenses at lower elevations while leaving plants less defended at higher elevations. Phylogenetically constrained tests of this hypothesis in tree populations are exceedingly rare. Nevertheless, the presumed presence of poorly-defended trees has been invoked as an important driver of recent pest outbreaks at higher elevations than historically common.

2. Tree age, growth rate, and size have all been correlated with levels of tree defenses. Thus, we sought to disentangle the interacting influences of these properties from possible elevational climatic effects on monoterpene composition, concentrations, and diversity of constitutive resin within three widespread pines (Pinus contorta, Pinus ponderosa, and Pinus flexilis) across a 1532 m elevational transect in the Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USA.

3. Collectively, elevation and tree properties were relatively weak predictors of defenses in P. ponderosa and P. flexilis, but explained ~ 75% of variation in monoterpene concentration and ~ 50% of diversity in P. contorta.

4. Increasing tree age had the greatest positive influence on monoterpene concentration and diversity in P. contorta, while increasing tree size had a negative influence suggesting a potential lifelong tradeoff between tree growth and defense. Elevation had a significant, negative influence on monoterpene concentration but little to no effect on monoterpene diversity in P. contorta.

5. Overall, we found some support for the EGPD hypothesis within P. contorta, but no support within P. ponderosa or P. flexilis. Our results suggest the presence of divergent conifer defense allocation strategies and drivers even among congeners growing in shared environments. An improved understanding of the controls on tree defenses, particularly possible influences of climate-based drivers, is necessary for predicting forest pest dynamics under global change scenarios.

Author Comment

This is version 1 to be submitted for peer-review.