Visitors   Views   Downloads

Fish assemblages above and below three road crossing types are similar in a prairie stream

View preprint
229 days ago
Fish assemblages above and below three road crossing types are similar in a prairie stream https://t.co/cTROUDzvPC
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Raw data of sampling locations, direction (upstream or downstream) electrofishing time, and species and abundance of fish collected in the South Loup River watershed

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27308v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Melissa Wuellner analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jeremy J Grauf conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Erik Prenosil approved the final draft, assisted in field collection, provided corroboating data, and assisted in manuscript preparation..

Wyatt W Hoback conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Keith D Koupal conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in Supplementary File 1. The raw data shows species collections by date, road crossing type, and direction. This information was combined in order to analyze the effects of road crossings on various fish assemblage characteristics.

Funding

This work was supported by the Nebraska Department of Roads (grant number M334) and the Department of Biology at the University of Nebraska at Kearney. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies