Visitors   Views   Downloads

Humanity and the 21st century’s resource gauntlet: a commentary on Ripple et al.’s article “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: a Second Notice”

View preprint
A year after the 2nd #ScientistsWarningToHumanity - an important and urgent call to action - overlooked biases in solutions may impede steps toward #sustainability : https://t.co/BiCwRDdiOT https://t.co/M2QNUnNyuf
602 days ago
Humanity and the 21st century’s resource gauntlet: a commentary on Ripple et al.’s article “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: a Second Notice” https://t.co/6hczksowfs
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental files providing further references

Supplemental files providing further references in relation to global environmental degradation (file S1), demography (file S2), inequalities (file S3), linkage between society and environment (file S4), food consumption (file S5), war and waste in the developing world (file S6), agriculture (file S7), and education (file S8).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27276v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Hannah Lewis is Compendium Editor at Biodiversity for a Livable Climate. Jane Ballard is a research fellow at the National Estuarine Research Reserve Association.

Author Contributions

Mohsen Kayal conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Hannah Lewis conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jane Ballard conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Ehsan Kayal conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code (it is an opinion piece).

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies