Visitors   Views   Downloads

New NSF policy will stifle innovation

View preprint
RT @Amanda_Stahlke: "...restrictions will exacerbate pressure on early-career colleagues who may turn to safe, fundable submissions rather…
"...restrictions will exacerbate pressure on early-career colleagues who may turn to safe, fundable submissions rather than novel and transformative ideas." This, restricting GRFP, and taking away DDIG. @NSF is stifling the next generation of scientists. https://t.co/7RC0ryoewN
RT @HLEisthen: Our letter signed by 70 biologists calling attention to the shortcomings of @NSF_BIO's new restriction on submissions is now…
RT @Biokid001: "New NSF policy will stifle innovation" preprint of letter that will publish in the 19 Octobert print issue of @aaas SCIENCE…
RT @HLEisthen: Our letter signed by 70 biologists calling attention to the shortcomings of @NSF_BIO's new restriction on submissions is now…
RT @HLEisthen: Our letter signed by 70 biologists calling attention to the shortcomings of @NSF_BIO's new restriction on submissions is now…
254 days ago
RT @HLEisthen: Our letter signed by 70 biologists calling attention to the shortcomings of @NSF_BIO's new restriction on submissions is now…
RT @HLEisthen: Our letter signed by 70 biologists calling attention to the shortcomings of @NSF_BIO's new restriction on submissions is now…
RT @crandallkeith: New NSF policy will stifle innovation https://t.co/1FdhAbUp24 via @PeerJPreprints
RT @HLEisthen: Our letter signed by 70 biologists calling attention to the shortcomings of @NSF_BIO's new restriction on submissions is now…
RT @HLEisthen: Our letter signed by 70 biologists calling attention to the shortcomings of @NSF_BIO's new restriction on submissions is now…
RT @crandallkeith: New NSF policy will stifle innovation https://t.co/1FdhAbUp24 via @PeerJPreprints
RT @crandallkeith: New NSF policy will stifle innovation https://t.co/1FdhAbUp24 via @PeerJPreprints
RT @HLEisthen: Our letter signed by 70 biologists calling attention to the shortcomings of @NSF_BIO's new restriction on submissions is now…
RT @grassfoundation: NSF decided to limit submissions to one per investigator per year! As the linked letter explains, this could have deva…
255 days ago
Our letter signed by 70 biologists calling attention to the shortcomings of @NSF_BIO's new restriction on submissions is now online. If you're worried about effect on collaborations and on early career investigators, please talk to your program officer. https://t.co/A6W85RrPoW
RT @Biokid001: "New NSF policy will stifle innovation" preprint of letter that will publish in the 19 Octobert print issue of @aaas SCIENCE…
RT @Biokid001: "New NSF policy will stifle innovation" preprint of letter that will publish in the 19 Octobert print issue of @aaas SCIENCE…
RT @Biokid001: "New NSF policy will stifle innovation" preprint of letter that will publish in the 19 Octobert print issue of @aaas SCIENCE…
RT @Biokid001: "New NSF policy will stifle innovation" preprint of letter that will publish in the 19 Octobert print issue of @aaas SCIENCE…
NSF decided to limit submissions to one per investigator per year! As the linked letter explains, this could have devastating impacts on collaborations in fields important to the Grass Foundation. @NSF #Neuroscience #Funding https://t.co/cJedL9qYrL via @PeerJPreprints
RT @Biokid001: "New NSF policy will stifle innovation" preprint of letter that will publish in the 19 Octobert print issue of @aaas SCIENCE…
255 days ago
"New NSF policy will stifle innovation" preprint of letter that will publish in the 19 Octobert print issue of @aaas SCIENCE https://t.co/FUxHIDxKpz Huge thanks to @HLEisthen for leading this effort and to @NSF_BIO leadership for their engagement in open discussion.
255 days ago
New NSF policy will stifle innovation https://t.co/lOhHbRNHM9
New NSF policy will stifle innovation https://t.co/1FdhAbUp24 via @PeerJPreprints
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Heather L Eisthen authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

This article involves neither data nor code.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies